In a unanimous decision by JUSTICE BURKE our Supreme Court has ruled that for purpose of the UUW statute [24-1.6(c)(iii)] there is no requirement that a “case” must be specific to a firearm or be portable. (The trial judge’s had denied a defense jury instruction based on the language of the statute and denied the defense the right to argue in closing that the console of a car where the gun was found should be considered a case, while allowing the State to argue to the contrary. Then, during deliberations, when the jury asked if the console could be considered a case, the trial court told them it was not a case!) Read the case, People v Diggins, No. 106367, 10/8/2009.
Cook County Public Defenders Blog
-
Categories
- Hot Legal Topics (41)
- In The News (137)
- Member Of The Month (6)
- Photos (5)
- President's Message (64)
- Uncategorized (19)
-
Archives
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
-
Meta